Geek Alert: Is Google’s Chrome a Match for Firefox?

Firefox has long been the champion of alternatives to Internet Explorer. With it’s tabs, plugins and other bells and whistles, it has been worth using, despite so many websites not being optimised to run in Firefox.
Chrome, a new competitor, has been around for long enough that it is time to take a serious look at it’s performance as a true rival to Firefox.
The last year or so, dedicated net users have begun to notice that Firefox isn’t really running the way it used to. Maybe it’s all the extensions and add-ons, but even with these disabled or uninstalled, the smooth fire-up of Firefox seems to be gone. In fact, Chrome has it over Firefox when it comes to starting up. Firefox takes six seconds while Chrome startes in less than one second.
Speed is one thing, but what about stability? Again, anyone using Firefox might have noticed that the browser crashes, hangs and freezes more often than used to. This is particularly noticeable for anyone running Windows 7. Somehow, they just don’t get along. Still, when compared to Chrome for stability, Firefox is the clear winner. Chrome struggles with WordPress and Ajax-based applications, and (the greatest sin) freezes catastrophically. That means that if you are in the middle of an e-commerce transaction and the browser crashes, it won’t save your details or the stage you were at. Firefox, no matter how glitchy it is, ALWAYS saves. Firefox will also cope with a large number of tabs being opened – between 30 and 50 depending on your computer. Chrome starts to freak out with only 20 tabs – annoying for a researcher or any mult-tasker!
The last, but by no means least, element is the purely user-centred design. Google came up with the brilliantly idea of opening a new tab to the right of the parent tab, instead of at the end of a long row of tabs. This was so brilliant in fact, that Firefox adopted the feature. So they perform the same in this way, but kudos goes to Chrome for coming up with it first. Chromes add-ons are also a lot faster than Firefox. So much so that it is often easier to switch to a Chrome-based app for a specific task than it is to fire up a Firefox extension. The downside of Chrome is the lack of customisation: You can’t decide where to have the address bar or drag favourites directly to the browser header.
Overall, Chrome is a faster browser for light net surfers, who don´t need to have more than twenty tabs open at a time. The apps are sleek (although minimal at the moment) and the intuitiveness of the browser action is almost creepy, it is so good. Chrome is worth installing, but Firefox fans probably won’t be making the full switch any time soon. Consider Chrome out of beta, but still in the ‘browser-lite’ stage of development. Rent apartments in Seville with Wi-Fi and stay in touch during your next mini-break.









